An Irish Bull on the Mexican Standoff

I like diversity, in the sense of having a lot to choose from. Not in the sense of having everything thrust on me with no choice allowed or even implied. The difference is obvious, but when you point it out to our SJW's they tend to hyperventilate and screech for "safe places," because they can't stand the idea or anything or anybody being actually excluded, for any reason whatsoever. That's Hitler stuff.

One nice kind of diversity is what they call parallax [link]. It's a physics term, but physics terms and the concepts they signify very often are applicable to other fields, like anthropology and politics. It's like this. If you look at a star with your telescope, you can tell so much about it. If you looked at it six months later, when the Earth has about 186 million miles because it circles the sun, you can also tell so much about it. But when you put those two observations together, you can tell a lot more about it. For one thing, you can come up with a much better estimate of how far away it is. And other things. Do read the link, or google "parallax."

And there's a metaphorical parallax when  you check to see what Americans are thinking, and then what other people are thinking, and compare them. You often get, as in physics, more than double the info, because two points of view can lead to conclusions neither point could on its own. And that's one reason I read the Irish Savant regularly. I also read him because he's downright entertaining. Today [link] he had this to say about America, Mexico, immigration, and you-know-who:

An opening for Donald

The American Presidential campaign got yet another insight into Latin American electioneering yesterday in Albuquerque as a Trump rally was violently attacked by an army of Spics. "Parents escorted scared kids past the chaos, and eventually police even set up a mounted horse unit to deter the crowds. However this was not enough, as protesters eventually began to riot. Rocks and bottles were thrown at police, and the protesters were eventually able to break through barriers, allowing them to rush the entrance of the convention center, at which point the riot police responded with tear gas."

Ah yes, la Democracia Mexicana. Explain to me how mobs of rioters intimidating White Americans while waving Mexican flags and burning American ones is supposed to damage the Trump campaign. I don't think the wetbacks really have a handle on this democracy thingy, no more than do their leaders south of the border. But that doesn't stop them berating their American counterparts for their inhumane treatment of the 'migrants'.

Here's Presidente Neto "'I think it's discriminatory, yes, and it's unfortunate for a country whose formation and historic origin relies so much on the migration flows of many parts, Europe and Asia, for instance.....and that's why it's unfortunate to hear the exclusionary and discriminatory tones regarding migration flows into the United States." And his predecessor fumed at the 'intolerance, hate and discrimination' endured by the unfortunate Mexicans criminal freeloaders roosting in the USA.

So can we take it then the Mexico itself operates an open door immigration policy?  Well.....no.  The Mexican legal code is quite specific. Would-be immigrants must provide birth certificate, documentation of financial independence and cannot have a criminal record.  You'll get refused if you're you're not 'physically or mentally healthy' or do not enhance 'the country's economic and national interests'. And how about this: Immigrants that risk upsetting'the equilibrium of national demographics' are booted out!

And boy, does Mexico boot them out.  Unlike in the US where illegals are showered with housing, education, health care, driving licenses and even get elected to City Councils, Mexico treats deportation backsliders to a hefty jail term before dumping them across the border....penniless and abused. As happened to thousands of Cubans summarily deported in 2008. Is there then a clamour for 'immigration reform' in Mexico?  Well, again no. Because Mexico has a battery of laws prohibiting non-nationals from political activity. And can be quite firm in tackling its own stroppy protesters, often gunning them down, hundreds at a time.

I'm waiting for Donald to point out this blatant hypocrisy and double standards. In fact I'm amazed he hasn't done it yet.  It's a powerful riposte and complements nicely the disgraceful behaviour of the illegals who now swarming over the whole country.

---------

Quibcag: The illustration I found on the net, just googling for Trump hat anime. I of course photoshopped the text on the cap to make it fit the posts. The quotation is from here [link].

Feminism: A Disaster for Men, Women, and Society as a Whole

I've written a lot about feminism on this blog. Just enter "feminism" in "Search this blog" over there on the top right and you can fmd a lot. I won't reprise any of it here, except for a couple of points. First, there are a lot of definitions of feminism, and the word's meaning, or at least emphasis, has changed a lot over the last century or so. Some take it to mean advocacy of legal equality of men and women in areas where actual sexual differences don't have an impact. That is, women of course can own property and vote, and do other things that might have been controversial in 1916 here and there, but which are now accepted as self-evident good ideas. But it also means that treatment of men and women can differ where actual sexual differences do have an impact. Men can be drafted, and women can't, etc. Most of us don't consider that variety of "feminism" to be feminism at all any more. But from there, the spectrum extends all the way from those who do want women eligible for the draft, to n-wave feminism, whatever it is right now, calling for either complete legal indifference to the male/female distinction, or, paradoxically, the legal elevation of female over male as a principle. And then, of course, you have paradoxist-feminism (I think I just coined a new word), which insists that women are so tough that they can be front-line cops, firemen firepersons, and infantry, but at the same time must be protected from microaggressions and given trigger warnings, lest the delicate creatures pass out from the vapors when some well-meaning poor schlub tells a woman she looks nice.

Also, as the quibcag points out, feminism is not exactly a phenomenon that does good things for women at the expense of men. Rather, it's a phenomenon that does horrible things to both sexes and to civilization in particular for the benefit of those who hate civilization or just see advantages for themselves in the havok it wreaks. It pretends to be pro-woman in much the same way that communism pretends to be pro-worker. You see, you're not really being kind to a girl when you sneer at her natural inclination to marry and become a mother, and bully her into trying to be a flamethrower-operator in the 82nd Airborne instead. (Disclaimer: I got out of the Army 45 years ago. For all I know, they don't even have flamethrower operators any more.) And you're also not doing her any favors when you teach her that she should put men down all the time and therefore end up either without a husband, or married to a useless wuss who likes to be put down all the time.

And beyond individual men and women, feminism, along with all the other idiotic -isms that are constantly lurching out at us, also has a crippling effect on the whole society, breaking down the people and institutions that make it function.  Over at [link], the Irish Savant has given this a lot of thought, and here is the result:

Feminising society: The cost

by the Irish Savant

My coruscating wit, encyclopedic knowledge and mastery of facts are normally sufficient to inflict a humiliating defeat on my debate opponent(s). However, in a disconcerting departure from the norm I recently found myself hesitant and unconvincing when discussing the feminisation of society. I suppose I had just assumed the  negative effects to be so obvious that mentally constructing a case was subconsciously deemed unnecessary.  But now, having marshalled my thoughts I offer the following to you for consideration.

(1) Psychological damage to boys. Boys learn from an early age that maleness is a pathology requiring remedial action. Boys' natural competitive instincts get ruthlessly suppressed, they're forced to play cooperative games that they hate. Should they rebel they will probably get arrested and drugged into quiescence. As the Roman writer Juvenal observed 'drive nature out with a pitchfork and it returns with ever greater force'. *

Suppressed natural instincts will find an outlet one way or the other, and unfortunately in all kinds of unpredictable and unpleasant forms.

(2) Traditional family undermined: The evidence is all before us, the traditional family model - the mainstay of our civilisation - comes apart at the seams. The feminised society has swung the marriage partnership so much against men (via skewed welfare inducements and biased courts) that a recent Pew Research study in the USA found the level of men intending to marry at its lowest level since records began.  And why should they marry? The deck is stacked against them.  Add in the bogus theory that women can juggle career and family without familial consequences and we see the result: The proliferation of stressed out single mothers whose children are dumped into the care of strangers for most of their formative years.

(3) Productivity impaired: Replacing White males in the workplace with women, blacks and other assorted minorities - shoehorned into their positions purely on the basis of their minority status - undermines efficiency, quality and productivity, ultimately resulting in a lower standard of living generally.  The pathologising of maleness has also stunted men's natural competitiveness and drive, the qualities that built whole civilisations. As for the health & safety racket, an exemplar par excellence of workplace feminisation.....don't get me started. Other than to say that you won't find a more worthless collection of parasites this side of the HR department.

(4) Immigration: It's been said that men invade, women invite and the truth of this aphorism can be seen in a picture of any "Immigrants Welcome" reception committee. But it goes deeper. The feminisation of society dissipates in-group cohesion which, when allied to the overall feminist-driven emasculation of the White male, prostrates our societies before the swaggering black and Muslim armies now swarming all over our precious White lands

(5) Personal accountability:  What's that, you might ask. Because nobody's responsible or accountable for anything any more. Every fucking thing is a 'human right', free this, free that.  We even have the right not to be offended. A brutal murderer is excused because of a 'difficult childhood' and if you trip over your feet while drunk you can bank on financial compensation in settlement. The corrosive impact on broader society is severe.

Dysgenics: All of the previous characteristics combine to ensure that those least fit to procreate end up doing most of the procreating. If you're a stupid worthless lazy parasite the system works to ensure that the more you spawn the more you get courtesy of the productive class. Said class, having to pay for their houses, children's education, medical expenses etc. are driven to have small families in whom they invest heavily. Society thus becomes progressively more degraded, debased and impoverished, with a rapidly growing orc population facing off against their ever diminishing eloi prey.

A serious indictment I'm sure you'll agree. and there's little to offset it on the other side of the ledger. The growing absence of masculine virtues will rot the people's vigour and relentlessly undermine social cohesion. And this is surely the plan, to socially engineer the White male out of existence. Or at least to the point where they become, as per Bertrand Russel's warning, incapable of rebellion. "Gradually the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."

Will White men fight back? Actually, will White women fight back? Because ultimately they're going to be the biggest losers. Andincreasing numbers of them are realising this. Many more suspect intuitively that the go grrrrlll dream they were sold might be turning into a nightmare.

In any event I believe we're close to the tipping point.

--------------
*I wanted to put the quote in the original Latin, so I Googled, but al I found was "Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret.", attributed to Horace, not Juvenal. And English translations vary, from "You may drive out nature with a pitchfork, but it will return with even greater force," to "You may drive out Nature with a pitchfork, yet she still will hurry back." Now, all I know about ancient Rome and her philosophers I learned from watching I, Claudius, but I'm still pretty sure that Horace and Juvenal were two different people, so Irish Savant probably was quoting from memory what he learned in school, and mixed the writers up, I say that because I understand that Brits actually learn stuff like that in school, and learn to quote Caesar and such folks when we Americans are memorizing Martin Luther King speeches instead.
--------------
Quibcag: The first has an illustration by KukuruyoArt. The second quibcag's illustration is actually the Hetalia: Axis Powers (Axis Powers ヘタリア). version of Ukraine, who is usually pictured this way, as a farm girl with a pitchfork.

South KKKorea

Lately, here and there on the net, I've encountered a lot of earnest SJW's accusing the Japanese of being racist because they aren't welcoming millions of "refugees" into their country. That's a little perplexing, because I remember being told over and over that only White people can be racist, by pretty much the same brand of SJW, when any Black behavior is every alleged to be just a teensy-bit anti-White. But maybe they're thinking of the Japanese as honorary Whites. That must be it. I remember elsewhere reading that if you rank countries by their average IQ, Japan comes in second place. Not that anybody would think racism and intelligence are correlated. Surely not. In fact, I also remember being told, also by SJW's, that only very stupid people are racists.  Interestingly, on the same list, guess what country is number one. Damned if it isn't South Korea, and it turns out that they're a bunch of racists, too. It must be something in the kimchi.

And one of my favorite bloggers, the Irish Savant [link] says that they're the most racist country in the world, which, I guess, makes their rank as the most intelligent country in the world even harder to understand, what with anti-racists being so brilliant and all. But fear not. If Irish Savant has named a terrible problem, he's also come up with a wonderful solution:

Remedying Korea's race problem

I've read recently that South Korea has been deemed the most racist country in the world. The horror! Whether true or not a recent report from one of the UN's gravy train riders (the splendidly named Mutuma Ruteere - 'you can rut here, Mutuma') has identified severe problems. From his report and many others it seems the explanation lies in Koreans' ignorance of the wider world, and by implications the benefits of diversity. And I suppose we could forgive them that, given that they've done quite well on their own so far. For instance in 1957 they had the same per capita income as that of pre 'independence' Ghana whereas now it's more than twenty times higher.

"In one way or another, racism affects almost every foreigner in Korea. But being black here is different. Whether African-American, African or not even black but mistaken for it, experiences in Korea are tainted by the perception that blacks are lower than other races: Blacks are violent, unintelligent and poor. Black Americans are not really American, and are inappropriate teachers for Korean children. The local media continues to be flooded with racist sentiments, advertisements and perceptions. It’s painful and it’s widespread."

"Black people report difficulty getting taxis, even when Koreans and whites get them on the same street. Some say cab drivers go so far as to make illegal U-turns into traffic to avoid picking up black passengers. Some Koreans will refuse to get into elevators with black people, and will often change subway cars to avoid being near black passengers".

On the other hand “there were meanings associated with the color white – peace, being a peaceful people, purity,”

Oh dear.

And the cause of this wrong-headed view of the po' blacks? It seems "American movies and music influenced Koreans to see blacks as dirty, poor, violent slum-dwellers. The U.S. way of looking at black people came to Korea so Korean people looked at black people just like Americans did.”

Right. So I have a great idea. Why doesn't the Western media create movies and TV shows with blacks in lead roles, as professors, doctors and scientists...and who are brave, intelligent and resourceful? Why not include an occasional black person in an advertisement, and in a positive role? Why not affirmative action blacks into high positions, positions way beyond their abilities, even to the level of US President? Why not encourage White women to see black males as ideal mating material?

I know these are crazy ideas. We all know they represents an inversion of reality. But wouldn't it be worth it were they to correct Korea's racism problem? And now here's another suggestion. According to this Korean journalist 'our racism is based on sheer ignorance'. You see - and he's right - only a tiny number of Koreans (here are some) have had direct experience of living with blacks and their (cough) 'culture'. So why not organise Cultural Exchange Programs whereby groups of Koreans spend a few months soaking in the authentic Black Experience in say.....Haiti, East St. Louis, Camden, Liberia or Somalia.

It'd certainly cure them of their ignorance, that's for sure.

-----------

Quibcag: You're right if you think it's not very closely related to the post, but I really couldn't pull an appropriate quote out of the post, and what is said about libertarians somehow reminds me of the SJW's in full fustian condemning these awful East Asians in both countries who'd rather not be enriched by oceans of vibrant immigrants. As for the illustration, I have no idea why the girl is listening to her hamster with earphones. Or maybe it's vice-versa.

Nations in Decline

Most thinking people think that the West and all its nations, including the United States, are in decline. For liberals and neocons, it seems just the reverse. They see the expanding role of government to be an improvement, a sort of progress. And when social rules and laws change to elevate dysfunctional people to elite status while the normal is pathologized, that's a big step forward. And according to Sir John Glubb, when nations and cultures decline, it's downright spooky how they all decline with the same symptoms. This is from The Irish Savant, here:
http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2015/02/a-lesson-from-history.html

A lesson from history

Sweeping generalised interpretations of broad historical trends tend to be suspect especially when used to push a contemporary agenda.  As with the social "sciences" the desired outcome may first be identified and the historical interpretation then retrofitted to conform to Approved Narrative. Sir John Glubb can fairly be excluded from this charge. A former head of the Arab Legion he spent many years examining eleven empires and discovered an astonishing consistency in their trajectory from growth through decline to eventual disappearance. He embodied this in his 1978 book The Fate of Empires and the Search For Survival, a summary of which can be read (here).  It should be read given its uncanny relevance to our own decline today.

Just take these excerpts alone:

“The people of the great nations of the past seem normally to have imagined that their pre-eminence would last forever. Rome appeared to its citizens to be destined for all time to be the mistress of the world. The Abbasid Khalifs of Baghdad declared that God had appointed them to rule mankind until the day of judgement. Seventy years ago, many people in Britain believed that the empire would endure for ever."

“When the welfare state was introduced in Britain, it was hailed as a new high-water mark in the history of human development. History, however, seems to suggest that the age of decline of a great nation is often a period which shows a tendency to philanthropy and to sympathy for other races … The rights of citizenship are generously bestowed on every race, even those formerly subject, and the equality of mankind is proclaimed. The Roman Empire passed through this phase, when equal citizenship was thrown open to all peoples, such provincials even becoming Senators and emperors. [And Glubb never even heard of Obummer!]. The Arab Empire of Baghdad was equally, perhaps even more, generous. During the Age of Conquests, pure-bred Arabs had constituted a ruling class, but in the ninth century the empire was completely cosmopolitan."[And on its way to self-destruction].

“The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolized by men. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed. 

“When I first read these contemporary descriptions of tenth-century Baghdad, I could scarcely believe my eyes……The resemblance of all the details was breathtaking – the break-up of the empire, the abandonment of sexual morality, the ‘pop’ singers with their guitars, the entry of women into the professions, the five day week......In the second half of the tenth century, as a result, much obscene sexual language came increasingly into use, such as would not have been tolerated in an earlier age.” 

“Neither is decadence physical. The citizens of nations in decline are sometimes described as too physically emasculated to be able to bear hardship or make great efforts. This does not seem to be a true picture. Citizens of great nations in decadence are normally physically larger and stronger than those of their barbarian invaders.  In a wider national sphere, the survival of the nation depends basically on the loyalty and self-sacrifice of its citizens."  [But] "the citizens of such a nation will no longer make an effort to save themselves, because they are not convinced that anything in life is worth saving." [Sweden, or indeed any advanced Western nation today?]

“As the nation declines in power and wealth, a universal pessimism gradually pervades the people, and itself hastens the decline … Frivolity is the frequent companion of pessimism … The resemblance between declining nations in this respect is truly surprising … The Roman mob, as we have seen, demanded free meals and public games … Gladiatorial shows, chariot races and athletic events were their passion. In the Byzantine Empire, the rivalries of the Greens and the Blues in the hippodrome attained the importance of a major crisis … The heroes of declining nations are always the same – the athlete, the singer or the actor.”

“We have not drawn from history the obvious conclusion that material success is the result of courage, endurance and hard work – a conclusion nevertheless obvious from the history of the meteoric rise of our own ancestors. This self-assurance of its own superiority seems to go hand-in-hand with the luxury resulting from wealth, in undermining the character of the dominant race.”

Hegel was correct  once again when he wrote "...what experience and history teach us is this - that people and governments never have learned from history, or acted on principles deduced from it."

Meanwhile, hastening the process of self-destruction along at merry pace is this guy, hiding in plain sight.

---------

Quibcag: This is, of course, Haruhi, from The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya (涼宮ハルヒの憂鬱 Suzumiya Haruhi no Yūutsu)

A St. Patrick's Day Story

"Irish Girl" by lilith-lips

What better way to celebrate St. Patrick's Day than by reblogging a nice Irish story from the Irish Savant? He writes:

Aer Lingus, take a bow.

Today my mood is joyous. There's a spring in my step, my fedora tipped at a jaunty angle. The cause of my joy? Met a friend of long standing this morning in the little town where we both live. Told me he had just taken issue with some burka-clad humanoid who had discarded some packaging onto our pristine footpaths (they really are pristine thanks mainly to local volunteer groups). We again shared our views on the catastrophic societal impact wrought by EU immigration policies and implemented by treacherous nation-wrecking scumbags like Alan Shatter.

Which brings me to the cause of my joy. Told me that while checking in at the Aer Lingus desk in Cork this week he saw two African adults in the queue, surrounded by a swarm of turdlers and a gigantic heap of luggage....enough to bring down a Flying Fortress. The girl at the desk pointed out that their luggage was significantly in excess of the weight limits and they'd have to pay the excess charges or leave some of it behind.

Cue the standard response from the Cultural Enricher Playbook. 'You being racist against me 'cos I'm blaaaaack'. But here's the good bit. In a firm no-nonsense voice the girl replied "no, you are being racist against me because I am white. Now either pay the excess or leave some luggage behind. Next please!"

Wow! How about that?

But it gets better. When my friend congratulate the girl on her response she told him that they had been instructed by Aer Lingus to respond this way. It seems they, and other passengers, were having to put up with so much grief from the enrichers that a line had to be drawn.

This folks, is great news. It shows that people, and more important, enterprises, are getting fed up of the shakedown from the parasites who have flooded into our country. I've seen other signs myself but this is surely something of a breakthrough. I feel so elated I'm now going to treat myself to tea and biscuits (at my age that qualifies as living on the edge).

Black History Month According To The Irish Savant

You remember how it was in school, when there was one kid who was a screw-up. He couldn't really help it, because that's the way he was put together. But the teacher was big on self-esteem, so whenever the kid managed to tie his shoes or sit at the right desk, she heaped praise on him to help him feel better and encourage him.  Black History Month and all the things that go with it are sort of like that. You've seen, I'm sure, those long lists of Black inventions — you can refresh your memory HERE. And the Irish Savant explains what it's all about, from his site HERE.

In honour of Black Histry Mumf

This site constantly ridicules the very  idea of  Black History Month, especially the claims made for black scientists.  Well, I have news for the bigots, to whom I present William Kamkwamba.
His breakthrough invention has lead to appearances on CNN, BBC, CNBC and even a fawning interview with Jon Stewart on the Today Show. He’s won a major book deal as the protagonist of ‘The Boy Who Harnessed The Wind” and been feted by climate change campaigners like Al Gore and business leaders the world over.

According to the BBC he’s even been invited to the “prestigious Technology Entertainment Design conference in Arusha, Tanzania”. (stop laughing at the back please!) They add “Mr Kamkwamba - who has been flown to conferences around the globe to recount his life-story - has the world at his feet” . One of the comments on the BBC (or was it CNN?) blog claimed‘conclusive proof at last that intelligence has no racial component’.

So now!  Check his dramatic story out on this post.

Dual Citizenship and Banks, Again

If you haven't been here for awhile, do scroll down to see other posts on the subject of Stanley Fischer, a foreigner who Obama thinks should be given immense power to mess around with our economy. It's not that he's inexperienced. On the contrary.  He was part of the gang that raped and looted Russia under Yeltsin. We can be sure that he's a seasoned professional in such things, and will do a terrific job in raping and looting us. Interestingly, the Irish Savant thinks that Fischer may be the straw that breaks the camel's back. One can only hope. From his blog HERE.

Of straws and camels' backs

In the early days of this blog I used to have long email discussions with Uncle Nasty (not his real name) on the issue of mass immigration. My beef was with the Africans and Muslims who were flooding into our lands and ruining them.  UN had a different view, seeing them as mere front line troops in a deep and ongoing Jewish plan for the demise of Western/Christian society.  Initially I disagreed, seeing Jews as highly intelligent and capable, and yes, while they might be 'liberal' and internationalist, I found it easy to understand why. And some of the earliest and most trenchant critics of mass immigration were the Jewish people I knew.

That was then of course, this is now.  As I dug deeper and deeper, peeled back layer after layer of the onion I came around to fully accepting his take. I still found it hard to understand why they continued to do what they do, given that they're in no danger at all in the West, au contraire, they're thriving.  It seemed so counter-productive. His explanation? That's just what they do.  They can't help it.

I've by now almost fully accepted his position on this as well, even though I still can't really get my head around it.  It's just so....perverse. And finally I came to an even more outlandish conclusion in that it seemed they use their power to  actually provoke and humiliate us.  And as I warned here, this was a very risky way to behave, irrespective of  your control and power.

UN pointed out that, always and ever Jews kept pushing and pushing, never learning, until at some point the host population exploded in anger, with predictably dire consequences.  Until very recently the  possibility of this happening today seemed, to my mind at last least, remote to the point of being non-existent.  Well,  I'm no longer sure of that either. You see, the nomination of Stanley Fischer,Governor of the Central Bank of Israel as the 'Deputy' Chairman of the US Federal Reserve has elicited a torrent of outrage. Before I go on to that let me say that I'm just staggered at the chutzpah here, which borders on the reckless.

The Federal Reserve (of course it's not 'Federal' at all. It's privately opwned by the major American banks and has been a Jewish preserve since God was a boy.  Over the last few decades has roundly screwed up the US economy and further enriched the infamous 1%.  Now were I a member of the tribe in question, especially when you consider that tribe's existing stranglehold on the MSM, Hollywierd, the law, politics and academia I'd be saying - and I really would - Jesus lads, take it easy will yez? We'll have everyone else down on top of us like a ton of bricks. This is totally over the top. Stop it, for the love of God or we're all fucked.

But they've gone ahead and done it.  And here's the rub.  There has - at last - been that explosion of outrage. Not of course from the editorial writers and columnists in the MSM, almost all of whom seem to have names like Cohen, Fleischer, Applebaum, Kravitz etc.  No, it's coming from the readers.  The ordinary Joes.  I have never seen anything like it either in terms of volume or vehemence. And look, I'm talking about the MSM, and middle-of-the-road economic and political blogs here, not the Alternative Right. All this despite what clearly has been a massive culling operation. For example up to late last night the LA Times printed a mere three comments (two of which were highly critical) whereas such a subject would normally attracts dozens of comments within hours.

Let me repeat: I have never seen anything like it. I've displayed below a representative selection.

Why do the terms 'straws' and 'camels' backs' spring to mind?

PS:  If you do your own checking look out for an hasbara in the classical mould, riding under the avatar of Anthony Alfidi.  He's everywhere!


Reader comments

It's a living nightmare. How did it come to this?  How can a tiny little racial group run the entire world's economy?


This should be enough to catapult "Mein Kampf" to #1 not just in the Politics section.
American now is in the same position Germany was ca. 1914-1929. Soon Americans will realize why Hitler (and most Germans, Austrians and Poles) hated the jews so much.


Their contempt for non-zionists, even other jewish people,  extreme hate - ironically you have never met a nazi until you've heard a zionist, greed, exploitation of anyone perceived as weak, and their superiority complex that stem from a mixture of propaganda and innate inferiority at the heart of their religion which cast them as wandering slaves. All of these heady brew of ideas form an extreme group of exceptionalists who believe themselves to be immune from criticism, with a deep victim complex that is used to justify hatred and harm to others who have never done them wrong.


Can you imagine Obama nominating Mahammad El Erian who maybe is more qualified than Mr. Stanley. An politicalquake of magnitude 9 will shake Washington


What the real history revisionist are saying is that "anti-semites" and "jew-haters" where a small minority, the real truth is that they where the overwhelming majority and for very good reasons.


American now is in the same position Germany was ca. 1914-1929. Soon Americans will realize why Hitler (and most Germans, Austrians and Poles) hated the jews so much


"They"  ain't just joobankers, "They" are joolawyers, joodoctors, joomovieexecs, joomediamoguls, joomercantilists, etc. And they all seem to subscribe to gentiles=cattle meme, in my experience. So yeah, lumping a group is as lumping a group does.


 It's a jew system, they devised it.  As it goes off the cliff and gets dashed to bits on the jagged rocks below, it is only fitting that jews are in the driver's seat.


Okay that's it. I am going to read Mein Kampf this weekend.


This is a complete outrage. The man is an Israeli, not an American. He has been structuring US aid to Israel for decades, doing vast damage to the US in a massive giveaway. In 1985 he rescued Israel with a US grant that comes to $1650/person in Israel, plus all the other aid. We can't know what he'll do, but we can be sure it will be a massive benefit to Israel at our expense, as is everything else this guy has done for decades. He is also a big player in the Israeli effort to turn the sanctions into a war. He is their leader in that effort.  Outrage!!!


Beggars belief!   Why not move the Fed over to Tel Aviv altogether?


As the old saying goes "Know a Jew, Hate a Jew"


Let the Goyim eat cake,    Enemy at the gate


The guy is a card carrying dual loyalist. He use to be a governor of Israel's central bank. Just imagine the advanced investment tips he can give the Israeli bankers. It is really a shame there isn't anyone with only American citizenship who can do the job. If he is confirmed confirmed it is an unbelievable outrage. My guess is if the American public learn of this there will be such a hue and cry he will not be confirmed. The audacity, the hubris. America, take Stanley Fischer down a peg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Vibrant Ethnic Diversity, Roma Style

Drawing by Glee-Chan, Quote by Dave Holle, Quibcag by Baloo

Guest post by Baloo:

I was discussing Star Trek and all its aliens with my good friend Dave Holle once, and as for the Vulcans, Klingons, Romulans, etc., he remarked:

"I've met stranger people than these in Chicago."

And, of course, he was right.  No matter how weird Klingons might seem to you, you have to admit that we have much weirder ethnic groups right here on Earth. Indeed, the many races of the Star Trek universe can best be seen as watered down versions of the groups of Earth. Klingons are not quite as violent as Africans, and not quite as stubborn as Samurai.  Vulcans are not quite as socially petrified as Chinese, and not quite as logical as Germans. Ferengi... Well, we'd better leave the Ferengi out of this.

Well Captain Kirk never met anybody quite as frustrating in his be-bopping around the Alpha Quadrant as the people known variously as Gypsy, Rom, Romany, Gitano, Zigeuner, цыган, यायावार, etc. In discussions you may have with people who assure you that immigrants, no matter where they're from, will assimilate right away, or at the very least by the second generation, just remind them of our Gypsy brethren, who've been in Europe for seven centuries or so and who still haven't assimilated and have no plans to do so.  Here, the Irish Savant tells us how the deep-thinking liberals in the UK are fixing it so that this time, finally, the Gypsies really will learn to fit right in and become regular Englishmen and Englishwomen any day now:

Don't know whether to laugh or cry...........

Sheffield City Council obviously has high hopes for its new Roma enrichers.

'Don't defecate or urinate on the street'
'Don't have sex on the street'
'Don't dump your rubbish in your neighbour's yard'
'Don't try to sell your babies'
'Don't shoplift'
'Don't rip out and sell the plumbing and other utilities from your taxpayer-provided housing'

Maybe the pictures shown here of a Roma settlement in Slovakia prompted the Council to issue these thoughtful suggestions. If you think they're of Pakistan or India then it's because that's where these parasitic scumbags originated. And now they'll be swarming over the UK and Ireland in even greater numbers from next January as the already pathetic immigration controls are abandoned entirely.

We really have arrived at the apex of insanity where literally the lunatics run the asylum.

Want another example?

'We want to claim our streets back. Tensions are building here. We need to do something or it will be too late’.

What's mad about that? Well, the fact that it was uttered by one Kashmir Malik of Sheffield's Pakistani 'community'. Yes, according to the Daily Mail 'the local Pakistani community association is running ‘official’ warden patrols between 8pm and 10pm every weekday with the intention of ‘educating’ the Roma population about ‘how to behave in England’.

'Our' streets............'how to behave in England'.

One's head spins. We descend deeper into the raging cauldron of insanity, of mass delusion as a nation self-destructs before our very eyes. We are the rats in the maze of this deranged experiment. Sheffield in this instance is the petri dish. But listen. There's method to the madness. It's an old totalitarian technique. Blatant and relentless cognitive dissonance, the absorption of one insane phenomenon after another, all serve to undermine the victim's (that's us) self-confidence, pride, dignity and by extension our capacity to resist. This tactic has been well established.

And what about this....... David Blunkett, a key member of the government that did more than any other to flood the country with the kind of people who build the kind of countries those same people are desperate to escape from........this guy warns that the area 'couldexplode into the ugly street warfare that broke out more than two decades ago'. Words fail me. Personally I'd take childcare advice from Casey Anthony before I'd take social advice from this decrepit horny old hypocrite.


Remember this, just in case the opportunity ever arises to roll out the tumbrels and bring these traitorous scum to justice. They have waged an unrelenting war against the family, against the community, against tradition, against history, against wisdom and experience, against individuality, against ethics, against common sense, against classical aesthetics, against reason and statesmanship.

Against reality and human nature itself.

In Sheffield we can see at first hand the results of their evil machinations. How cannot the great mass of people not see how they've had their country taken from them? Is there any hope?

The "B" Team

Yes, indeed — Another CARTOON BY BALOO.

By gosh, Baloo was right, wasn't he?  Actually, though the McCain/Obama race was more extremely pathetic than most, it is a fact that every four years, we basically have two losers running against each other.  Was McCain, or Romney, really anything like the best person A the Republicans to find to be President?  Of course not.  And, as for Obama, as pathetic as Democrats are, it's actually hard to come up with a Democrat who wouldn't be a better President than him. Try it. Surprising, eh?

Well, this can't be random, can it? Democrats nominated Obama instead of Bayh, Kerry instead of Kerrey, Gore instead of Webb, Clinton instead of Nunn, etc.  And Republicans nominated Romney instead of Sessions, McCain instead of Paul, Bush instead of Thompson, Dole instead of Gramm, and Bush instead of Buchanan.  Not that the alternatives mentioned were all great, but they would clearly have been better.  So is it just some kind of democratic glitch that mediocrities have an advantage?  Maybe, but it seems more likely that candidates are picked not for their quality, but for their usefulness to the elite.  The Irish Savant has it figured out, and his evaluation of the egregious John McCain is especially noteworthy.  This is from HIS BLOG.  I visit it daily, and so should you.

Have you a better explanation?

This particular 'straight talker' can't speak for five minutes without paying obeisance to concepts like honour, integrity, patriotism and duty, while this self-proclaimed 'maverick' is, as he reminds us at every opportunity, not afraid of asking "the tough questions". Yes, I can of course be referring only to the vile, debased, degenerate John McCian.  You know, the 'War Hero'?

In this post I pointed out that in fact he was a coward, by legal definition a traitor who betrayed military secrets and aided the enemy, who was mired in corruption throughout his political life (Boeing, Jack Abrahamson, the Keating Five), who divorced the faithful wife who waited all the years he was in captivity and within a month married a billionaire's daughter. As a returned POW he made a mini career out of championing the rights of the missing in action (MIA) military.  Until Big Business decided they wanted friendly relations with Vietnam, at which pointed he rounded on his erstwhile colleagues, using his influence to bring the initiative to a sudden close. I might add that he finished sixth from bottom of his class of 500 at Annapolis.

Of course the apple didn't fall far from the tree, as McCain's father was assigned the task of covering up for the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty.  For which sterling patriotic work he had an aircraft carrier named after him.

Now can you just imagine what a political opponent and a free press would do to someone with a record like that. He'd be shredded, right?  And disappear overnight, never to show his face again.

Now look at Obama. He seems like a picked to fail candidate.  Almost certainly legally inelegible for President due to his citizenship status, phony birth certificate, highly doubtful parentage, possibly a Muslim, academic records hidden away, frequenter of gay bath clubs in Chicago. Again, what would a political opponent and a free press do to someone with a record like that?

But the point is, neither for McCain nor Obama did their respective opponents or the press allude to these fundamental issues at all. They hardly featured in the campaigns, incredible as it seems.

Now in the post I linked to earlier I also raised the same fascinating question, but did not hazard an explanation.  Well, with the years came wisdom of a sort. It's now quite clear to me that the Real Government organised candidates over whom they held the power of swift and total destruction. The deal being, you do as we say, vote as we say, or we'll unleash the hounds of war. The wholly owned MSM will be given the go ahead and our bought and paid for politicians will also, unfettered, open up for all they're worth.

Can I be 100% certain of this?  No.  But is there a likelier explanation? Not to my mind.

Truly frightening

The Irish Savant in Bulgaria

Illustration from Zerochan

All I know about Bulgaria is that they speak Bulgarian there, and that Bulgarian is an offbeat Slavic language that's interesting in itself.  Oh, I knew that it was part of the Ottoman Empire, and that it therefore has various ethnic groups other than Bulgars, but I had no idea how complex it all was.  But the Irish Savant has actually been there, and here are his observations, from THIS BLOG, which I advise you to visit frequently.

Bulgaria

I’ve been visiting Bulgaria quite a lot over the last year. It has a definite Third World air about it. I was surprised at how poorly people, even well-qualified IT staff, were paid. Roads, footpaths, buildings and cars are all in a very dilapidated state and Sofia has hardly a feature of note. I found the IT specialists to be very capable, so not sure why the country has languished do much.

Part of it must be the very high proportion of gypsies and Muslims. Gypsies everywhere being a parasitical drain on society – Bulgaria is no different - while every Muslim country without oil or gas – and some with them - is an economic basket case. Presumably the only reason this country and Roumania were accepted into the EU was to keep them away from Russian influence. Which, we can be assured, would be a Very Bad Thing.This dismal state of affairs carries it with one consolation at least. There is virtually no visible evidence of cultural enrichers (Bulgaria’s Muslims are almost all ethnic Bulgars). That’s not the case in many other ‘Eastern’ European countries. And the explanation is obvious….no easy pickings, in the form of free housing, education, health care etc. of the kind that are available to any Third World parasite who fetches up on western shores.

The more eagle-eyed among you will have noted that I did not prefix ‘consolation’ with ‘small’. Because it is very far from being small. In another twenty to thirty years, when Belgium, Holland and Sweden are minority White, and have descended into squabbling impoverished Lebanons of the north, the Bulgarians, if they remain close to 100% White, will be sitting pretty. They will be the same as all White countries, rich and successful. Meanwhile Britain, France and the rest of the West will inexorably be forced down the demographic trail of destruction pioneered by the Swedes and Belgians. To those counties will come smart well-educated Bulgarians as highly-paid specialist advisers, attempting to resurrect those failed states while asking themselves how these former powerhouses could have fallen to such a state of dilapidation.Let us sincerely hope they learn why. And that they learn it very soon.

That was the entire post on Bulgaria, but you can read more posts from the Irish Savant HERE.

Genocide: An Older Idea Than You Might Think

Genocide.  Nasty word. We hear it a lot, and see, well, hundreds of documentaries and books about it. A nasty word for a nasty thing.  Just look at what the Germans did to people in this illustration.... Huh?  Oh, sorry, wrong photo.  This is what was done to the Germans by the Allied carpet-bombing of Dresden.  Something hardly anybody would have even heard of if it weren't for Kurt Vonnegut, bless his memory.
My point here is that there's nothing new about killing a whole bunch of people, even (or especially) about killing, or trying to kill, every individual of some race, tribe, religion, nation or whatever that you don't like.  We remember (or do we?) the recent attempt of the Hutu of Rwanda to murder all the Tutsis in the country.  Actually, such things are popular in Africa, with the regimes in Zimbabwe and South Africa encouraging an enthusiastic but clumsy genocide of all White people in both countries.  And we all know about the Turkish attempt to kill all their Armenians a century ago.
The Irish Savant has located the plans for an even more ambitious genocide project from before anybody had even heard of the Hitler Holocaust.  Check it out:

Germania delenda est

A classical Jewish response to accusations of German hatred (and I’ve personally heard this) goes ‘they tried to exterminate my people, literally wipe us off the face of the earth, every last man, woman and child.’ Except that they did not. The Germans wanted all Jews out of their sphere of influence, to seize their property and to work them as slave labourers. After that to banish them to the wilds of Russia where their ultimate survival would be a matter of indifference.

Callous and cruel yes, a policy of extermination, no.  In the fog of war vast numbers of Jews were murdered, starved or worked to death. But nowhere, not even in the minutes of the famous/notorious Wannsee Conference, where the details of the alleged extermination were supposedly worked out, has such a plan been found.  And trust me, they’d find it if it were there.

Now if it’s a detailed carefully worked out plan for racial extermination that you’re looking for, well I can help. Exhibit 1 Julius Rosenberg lookalike Theodore N. Kaufman, a New York based Jewish businessman who  in 1941 wrote a book with the cheery and unambiguous titleGermany Must Perish. Here the author made clear that Germans as a race must be wiped out.  He ruefully acknowledged that the direct murder of upwards of fifty million people was ‘impractical’ and instead proposed a neater but equally effective solution: Sterilisation for every German male (not sure if he had females in mind as well).  In one fell swoop the extermination of the German race would be accomplished within a generation. You might imagine that such malevolence would have resulted in his being committed to jail or a lunatic asylum, but far from it.  The press gave it respectful attention and he earned handsome money by lecturing on his plan throughout the country. 

(Surprising, eh? Read the rest HERE.)

The Irish Savant Strikes again.

As I said before, the Irish Savant is really good with pictures.  He has a Pulitzer-winning one up at his site right now, that I'm resisting the temptation to swipe, for at least a few more days.  Go see it HERE.

The Irish Savant

The Irish Savant does it again.  He has a real feel for artistic invective.  Go take a look at THIS.

The Media is the Message

Cartoon by BALOO

This is apparently all over the net, but I found it over at The Irish Savant, q. v.
__________________

All you need to know about the MSM in one post.

Isn't it amazing that, within only one week of Tiger Woods crashing his Escalade, the media found every woman with whom Tiger has had an affair during the last few years? And, they even uncovered photos, text messages, recorded phone calls, etc.!
Furthermore, they not only know the cause of the family fight, but they even know it was a wedge from his golf bag that his wife used to break out the windows in the Escalade. Not only that, they know which wedge.

And, each and every day, they were able to continue to provide America with updates on Tiger's sex rehab stay, his wife's plans for divorce, as well as the dates and tournaments in which he will play.

Now, Barack Hussein Obama has been in office for three years, yet this very same media:

·Cannot find any of his childhood friends or neighbors;

·Or find any of Obama's high school or college classmates;

·Or locate any of his college papers or grades;

·Or determine how he paid for both a Columbia & a Harvard education;

·Or discover which country issued his visa to travel to Pakistan in the 1980's;

·Or even find Michelle Obama's Princeton thesis on racism.

They just can't seem to uncover any of this. Yet there are still some idiots out there who actually believe what the media tells them.

The Irish Savant

This illustration has absolutely nothing to do with the post.

The Irish Savant has a fascinating blog.  Mostly it's about politics and race, and you usually have to click through a "content warning" to get to it, but it's worth it.  Today he has a nice little video called "South African Handshake."  Go see it HERE.