Monday, July 11, 2016

Geographical Self-Segregation

With few exceptions, very few, everybody wants to live next door to White people. This seems to apply to White people of all kinds. The honest ones would like nothing more than to live in an all-White neighborhood, and say so. The dishonest ones also would like nothing more than to live in an all-White neighborhood, but lie about it and say the opposite. This second group —most liberals, libertarians, and neocons — often uses euphemisms, and says they want to live in neighborhoods with good schools or a low crime rate, things like that. And we all understand that what that means is that they want to live in an all-White neighborhood.

Virtually all Blacks, too, very much want to live in all-White (except for them, of course) neighborhoods. That's why they've been screaming and whining for decades about how they want school bussing and affirmative action and blockbusting and housing vouchers and the Federal government guaranteeing that they can live in White neighborhoods.

Maybe many Latinos actually would rather live in Latino neighborhoods than in White neighborhoods, I don't know. But I do know that they don't want to live in Black neighborhoods, or in neighborhoods with any number of Blacks at all.

The latest Black Panther enthusiasm is that they want us to turn the deep South states over to them as a place for Blacks to live exclusively. I can't help thinking that either they really don't mean that, or that they envision being put in charge of such a country and getting great big heaps of foreign aid to make up for centuries of yadda yadda yadda.

If somehow such a thing did come to pass, though, and we were guaranteed that every Black person in America would go there to live...  Well, a nice fantasy. If we had a Brexit-type vote, the White vote in favor of such a project, assuming a secret ballot, would be in the realm of 99%.

Another crazy idea that just might work, eh? Vox Day muses on the possibilities [link]:

Mailvox: you're going to need a bigger state

IreneAthena suggests permitting whites to self-segregate to a reservation:
What's all this about designating one state, or five, and forcing all the blacks to move there? That idea smacks of the slave trade, with Africans being dragged away from their familiar homes and forced to live in places not of their choosing.

What we need is a separate state--just one ought to do it -- reserved for Whites who can't manage to live in the same state with any of the other races. If whites want to live in such an exclusive setting, they may, but they'll have no other options besides that one state. State of the Snow White Princesses Far Away from any Black-Eyed Peas.

Everyone else can live where they'd like, also. Even the most vocal "we need our safe space" minorities wouldn't mind living in a mixed-race STATE, or a mixed-race CITY, if not a mixed-race neighborhood. Woik it out, people.
I don't think she understands how fast tens of millions of white people would move to a state guaranteed to be all-white. Nor does she likely understand how that state would rapidly begin to significantly outperform the rest of the country, or how many non-whites would be clamoring to be permitted entry.

After all, diversity means nothing more than chasing down white people in an attempt to escape the negative consequences of being surrounded by your own kind. It's Magic Dirt theory in action.

The sad thing is that we used to have such a reservation. It was called "America". Only whites, specifically those of English descent, were truly and properly considered American; that is why all other types of "Americans" are hyphenated or otherwise modified, including "Native Americans".

(We American Indians are better understood as pre-Americans in this regard; the concept is concerned with the nation, not the continent.)

But, rightly or wrongly, the system was designed to permit other whites to become quasi-Americans, which more or less worked until the voluntary nation was transformed into a conventional empire by the force of arms. Which took place, it should not surprise you to know, with considerable assistance from recent immigrants forced into military service.

I find it both mystifying and amusing that even as many white Americans today lament the disappearance of their rights, the destruction of their communities, and the decline of their society, they continue to cling to the cretinous myth of equality and the equally nonsensical concept of a propositional nation that is, more than anything else, responsible for the very transformations they rightly decry.

That is why they fully deserve what they are experiencing, and what they are going to experience in the future. It makes absolutely no sense to mourn the decline of America while celebrating equality, diversity, and immigration because it is equality, diversity, and immigration that are the primary causal factors in that decline.

To quote the great angelic philosopher, Tila Tequila, "People are all angry about what's happening but guess what? It's called karma! You cannot stop what is coming for YOU created it!"

UPDATE: A reader points out that there are plenty of American blacks who would like to prefer to have their own homogeneous nation-state too.
Babu Omowale, the so-called national minister of defense for the People’s New Black Panther Party, says his group and allied organizations have their sights set on establishing “our own government in a nation within a nation.” Omowale used the interview to claim five states as belonging to the “Black Nation”: Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, and Georgia.

The revolutionary stated: “We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.”
I suspect a lot of white Americans would take that deal. After all, only a true racist would oppose African-Americans getting their own sovereign and independent homeland. It's time for whites to stop oppressing blacks by ruling over them, which is nothing less than a legacy of slavery. It's time for a national referendum on #Blaxit.
------------
Quibcag: I don't know where I originally found the liberty cap girl. I think somebody emailed her to me.

9 comments:

  1. Or Asians.
    It could work if we go back to the limited government and federalism of the Constitution.
    When the late 1800s immigration happened, the railroads would create segregated towns where even different nationalities would get their own county, Norwegians in one, Germans in another.

    But we'd still need the proposition. One can ask if there can be a propositional nation, but if 2/3 of the natives cannot correctly detail the proposition (What is the 3rd amendment?) it can't be a propositional nation.

    The other problem is there was no proposition, Jefferson, Hamilton, and Adams all disagreed in what the proposition was and not in small ways. Hamilton wanted manufacture, Jefferson yeoman farmers. Slavery was ever controversial. Federal v.s. State power. Tariffs and such split the north and south and ended in war.

    But it isn't just race or nationality. Merkle should be exiled to Fallujah. But that points out that even sex is a problem. We can't get men and women of the same narrow tribe to be consistent.

    Christianity (and WASPish nonconformist versions) was a big part, as well as some of the ideas of the Enlightenment (else see the French Revolution). The Federal Government was small, but the higher civil ethos was nonconformist, and even have held to their flavors even after generations.

    Although not quite as bad as the attempt at "transgender" (no, we can't make a woman a man or a man a woman), the races also differ. Whites are nonconformist and creative enough to have built the modern world and western civilization. Asians are too conformist - Japan and China can only copy, not create. Africans are too aggressive so tear down things faster than they are created. Not all, and some is cultural. But Rhodesia was a nice country, Zimbabwe became a hell hole. Democracy only works among like people, the people didn't understand the Whites weren't privileged, they could sacrifice, delay gratification, not consume their seed-corn. Same in South Africa. Whites prospered because of their culture and behaviors, not their skin color, magic, or oppression.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This essay seems accurate and the above comment about the Constitution seems to point out some good points also. There is too much to go into but the ideas of "tz" seems to accurately portray the basic arguments and approach of the founding fathers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe you've heard this bit of news lately: Pokemon GO. Haven't played it, don't think I want to either. AFAIK, it's only been released in two countries so far, Japan (of course) and the US. To give you an idea how it works, here's a YouTube of the Game Boy Fire Red version, it's 12 minutes, plays long enough to show you the basics.
    In Pokemon GO, instead of the player character wandering around in the game world encountering wild Pokemon and trainers to battle and places like Pokemon Centers to heal injured Pokemon, you use your phone's GPS to wander around in the real world to do these things.
    Fun and clever idea in Japan, someone doing that may get strange looks, but they're pretty safe. In the US however, a player wandering around is going to be somewhat distracted from their surroundings, wander into the wrong area searching for Pokemon or other game events could easily get someone killed.
    Think ''White player wanders into 'da hood' looking for a rare Pokemon, gets chimped out on by BLM''. Something Japanese in Japan would not need to be concerned about - or even aware of.
    You see the problem don't you? Nintendo is going to really regret ''not doing their homework'' before releasing a US version.
    My advice? In the US, stick to playing the Game Boy/DS/3DS Pokemon and play it indoors.
    I think my point here is, of course, it ain't all one big happy world - the Japanese have been fortunate to be naive about that.
    Personally I hope Nintendo disables and withdraws the game from the US market. The bad press may wind up forcing them to do that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. American blacks having their own country might be a good idea or a bad idea, but it's not a new idea.

    Abraham Lincoln wanted to repatriate freed slaves to Africa. He thought it would strengthen America.

    In the 1920s, the USSR's Comintern started advocating the formation of a "Republic of New Africa" in five southern states. The USSR thought it would weaken America.

    In the 1960s, the Black Panthers became useful idiots for the USSR by picking up the Republic of New Africa idea. They thought it would provide a large geographic area for them to loot.

    A Republic of New Africa was a bad idea in the 1960s, but it's a better idea now. It would be unfair to non-black residents of the five southern states, of course. But consider the upside: Those people would move back to America and in the long run, they'd be better off than they are now.

    Give blacks five southern states with all non-critical infrastructure. We would remove or retain any critical infrastructure as part of the United States. Give the new country $100 billion in startup money. But there would be two non-negotiable conditions:

    1. After we give blacks their own country, that's the end of our responsibility for them. Whatever happens to them afterward is not our problem: it's theirs. They say they want to be free and independent? Their wish is granted. No more blaming us for all of their problems. We won't do anything to hurt them, but we will have no duty to help them, either.

    2. Any blacks who choose to remain in the United States will have the same rights as everyone else, but no more. No affirmative action. No special preferences. If they commit violent crimes or attack police, they might get killed and nobody will say they didn't have it coming. If they work hard, obey the law, and contribute to society, they will get the same respect as anyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Blacks have had their own country since about 1822. It's called Liberia. Round them up, stuff them on garbage scows, and tow the whole boiling of them back there, having first destroyed any record of them ever being citizens here. They want an all-black society? They got one! Just call me "Santa Claus!" Of course, dealing with such racial brothers as General Butt Naked would be interesting for them...

    ReplyDelete
  6. When I was about 12 years old I read a book by The Amazing Criswell! in which he predicted all the blacks in the U.S. moving to Mississippi by about 1970. He was wrong, obviously. So much for psychics!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I said it before but I'll say it again, I don't consider these black monsters to be homonids. They look like apes, they act like apes and their anatomy is fairly indistinguishable to apes.
    Giving any land to these monsters is like letting cancer live in your body. They never develop into anything good. They ruined Rhodesia, crushed the prosperity of South Africa, destroyed the entire White population and economy of Haiti. They aren't people, they're a pest species. They ruin everyplace they infest.
    In Africa these retarded apes trip over diamonds and let gold mines crumbled to nature whilst doing the only thing they do naturally, kill, loot and rape.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Aw hell no... they ain't having no part of the south...they can keep Michigan, all the model black run cities up there and points east. Those in the Southern States that don't like it can move north too. They can go live with the abolitionists and other feel good idiots that started all this mess several hundred years ago; their ancestors imported them from Africa to sell in the south for profit...they can have their just results back!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Miles GloriosusJuly 12, 2016 at 8:04 AM

    American blacks having their own country might be a good idea or a bad idea, but it's not a new idea.

    Abraham Lincoln wanted to repatriate freed slaves to Africa. He thought it would strengthen America.

    ===

    Lincoln only endorsed the idea when he was running for office before an entirely white electorate that was suspicious of his abolitionism. As president he did nothing about it. At the end of the war he endorsed negro suffrage. So forget the garbage about what he allegedly wanted to do.

    ReplyDelete