Friday, June 27, 2014

The Multidownsides of Multiculturalism

When American colonists swarmed into Texas in the early 19th century, very few of them wanted to become Mexicans. They wanted to remain Americans, with all their customs and religions and folkways — they just wanted to live in Mexico. Actually, as it turned out, they didn't even want to do that. They revolted, established an American-style republic, and became an American state. As has so often been the case, "immigrants" turned out to be colonists at best, and invaders at worst.

Very few people cross a border in order to become different people. The Turks who invaded Anatolia didn't want to become Greeks, and they didn't, as you can see. Caesar didn't invade Gaul in order to dress up like Asterix and become a Druid. Dutch colonists in South Africa didn't want to start a new life as Zulus. And the later Brit invaders of the same area didn't want to become Boers and speak Afrikaans. And the European Crusaders in the Holy Land certainly didn't want to convert to Islam and become Bedouin.

And, despite all the Ellis Island rhetoric, current immigrants to America, with some notable exceptions, don't have the slightest intention of assimilating and becoming Americans. Just look at Piers Morgan.

So if we accept a million immigrants from Bangla Desh, say, what we're going to end up with is a million Bangla Deshis in America, not a million new Americans. And they will almost unanimously demand that America change its own laws and customs to accomodate Bangla Deshi culture. Bet on it.

And it's not just odd-smelling food (which can actually be a plus) and exotic clothing (which can sometimes be quite pleasant). It's also things which can wreak havok on American culture, like arranged marriages, Sharia law, honor killings, and slavery. And, if you go far afield enough to find your vibrant immigrants, it can include Voodoo religion, cannibalism, female circumcision, exotic diseases, and other revolting customs that you haven't even thought of.

And Obama's latest plan to basically resettle everybody in Central America into everyplace in the United States from Mayberry to Riverdale has opened us up to some sexual developments that would turn Hugh Hefner's stomach — Hell, even Larry Flynt's stomach. At http://voxday.blogspot.com/, Vox Day reports:

Immigration and sexual exploitation

The sexual exploitation of children is on the rise in America according to the FBI:
Six child victims and three pimps were discovered by law enforcement officers during the last several days in Texas. The apprehensions were made as the result of Operation Cross Country, an effort to curb commercial sex trafficking in the United States. Michelle Lee, a San Antonio-based FBI spokeswoman, told Breitbart Texas that the sexual exploitation of children is "increasing exponentially." The victims and pimps found during the most recent sting were located in Austin and San Antonio, according to a press release from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The recovered children were victims of child prostitution....

The number of child victims, as well as the number of arrests, related to child exploitation increases every year. Lee said, "It's not just because we're getting better at understanding the threat. ... The threat is also getting worse. At least here in San Antonio, our observation is that children are being victimized in increasing numbers when it comes to sexual exploitation and trafficking. It's increasing exponentially."
It is ludicrous to attempt to blame the increase on "social media". The real reason is immigration. There are four reasons why immigration is the primary cause of the increase in sexual exploitation:
  1. The stepfather effect: Men are far more likely to sexually exploit and abuse children of different races than children of their own race. The protective instinct all men is feel towards children is reduced due to the lack of visible genetic connection to the children.
  2. The color effect: In America, blacks, and particularly Hispanics, are much more likely to molest children than whites. Blacks are 1.85x more likely to molest children, and Hispanics are 2.35x more likely to do so. So, the more People of Color there are in a society, the more sexual exploitation of children there will be.
  3. The broken family effect: Immigration usually separates a nuclear family from an extended family, and often separates an individual from his nuclear family for extended periods of time. If they are children without the protection of a family, these individuals are more readily victimized. If they are adults, these individuals without the civilizing influence of a family more readily behave in a predatory manner, including a sexually exploitative one. 
  4. The cultural effect: Many immigrants come from cultures where it is acceptable to marry young girls as young as eight. The fact that they have changed their geographical location does not magically change their cultural values. They simply view underage girls as viable sexual objects in a way that no normal American does.
Since mass immigration, especially the immigration of unaccompanied children, has been on the rise, we can safely expect the sexual exploitation of children to continue to exponentially increase until the mass repatriations finally begin. The problem isn't limited to America either; in the UK, there are many networks of "Asians" (mostly Pakistanis) who have been systematically preying upon British girls for years, luring them in with presents and handsome young boyfriends, then gang-raping them and turning them into prostitutes.

Now that the economy is in depression, both observably and statistically, one cannot even argue for the economic benefits of immigration. Mass immigration is a societally destructive force, and the only civilized long-term solution is the mass repatriation of the various immigrants to their native lands.
----------
Quibcag: It was a challenge to find an acceptable illustration for such a quote and situation, but I persevered. Here we have Kagura (神楽) of Gin Tama (銀魂 Gintama, lit. "Silver Soul"), who is not entirely a child, but certainly underage by the standards of most civilized people. But, being an extremely powerful alien, she's not at all vulnerable to sexual or any other kind of exploitation, as you can see.

2 comments:

  1. It should also be of note: When the USA outlawed polygamy some Mormons (Romney family) and others moved south of the southern border to continue this practice. Some assimilated, some did not.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Of course the Dutch did not want to become Zulus. When the Dutch first settled at Table Bay there weren't any Zulu within 1000 miles of the Dutch. It was close to 200 years before the Dutch and Zulu ran into each other .

    One author, Mitchner I think, stated that if the Zulu had moved at the same pace they had and the Dutch had not been in SA, it would have taken the Zulu until the 1970s to reach Cape Town where the Dutch first settled.

    The Hottentots and Bushmen who lived in the area would have been just as screwed no matter who invaded, the Dutch or the Bantu.

    ReplyDelete