Thursday, March 6, 2014

The Race to Racism

"Racism" these days doesn't really mean anything, and is equivalent to "heresy" as it was used in the old days. But it differs in that, unlike heresy, only certain classes of people can be guilty of it. It gets a little complicated, because some people will throw the word around without learning the rules first, but essentially, only White people are even capable of racism, and hardly any of them are not racists.

The hierarchy is a bit more complex than that, though, because any non-Black can be capable of racism if such racism is perceived to be against Black people. Even holy American Indians or Eastasians (sort of honorary Whites in many respects these days) can be racists if Blacks want to call them that. Even then, though, the racism is usually said to be caused somehow by White people.

But Blacks, of course, are absolutely incapable of racism, or, indeed, any moral failings. To get a little theological, like other angels, Blacks seem to have been created without free will, and can only do the right thing in any instance — you know, like Obama — while Whites and others have all too much free will and always do the wrong thing.  Except, of course, for the anointed White liberals, who seem to have built this hierarchy.  Over at Just Not Said, John Craig says:

Which accusations stick, and which ricochet

It's always enlightening to see the fallout from accusations of racism in this country. If a black accuses a white of somehow favoring his own, or of trying to undermine blacks somehow, the white can try to prove the charge wrong, which is near impossible. Or he must apologize, grovel, scrape, hire unqualified minorities, and pay lip service to diversity.

(Somehow, blacks never get accused of racism, no matter how much racial solidarity they show. Ninety-eight percent of them can vote for the black candidate over the white one, and it means nothing. They can play the knockout game to their heart's content, and the media will just pretend it never happened. And all black on white crime is evidently "random." Blacks are just assumed to be pure of heart.)

If an Anglo accuses a Jewish person of somehow favoring his own, or of trying to undermine the goyim, however, the accusation never sticks. Instead, the focus gets completely turned on the Anglo for his perceived anti-Semitism. If the Anglo is prominent, Abraham Foxman will land on his back like a hungry wolverine dropping out of a tree. The Anglo will then have to apologize, grovel, scrape, and explain how he has seen the error of his ways.

Then, he'll probably lose his job anyway.

It is completely irrelevant whether the Anglo's original accusation is true. (This blogger's opinion: it never is, otherwise we'd see disproportionate numbers of Jewish people in positions of power and a disproportionate amount of our foreign aid funneled towards Israel.)

There's a lesson here for the Anglos: the best defense is a good offense. If you're incredibly aggressive about protecting your own ethnic interests anytime anyone points out how aggressive you are about protecting your own ethnic interests, eventually everybody will be too cowed to point it out.

That is the position you want to occupy in a society.

My suggestion to the next hapless Anglo accused of racism: turn the accusation around. Snarl that your accuser is trading in an age old canard, and of promoting a shibboleth. Organize with other Anglos to demand that the accuser be fired from his job.

The next time someone tries to bundle you off to reeducation camp for some sensitivity training, instead of turning the other cheek, scream, "That is the dirtiest of blood libels!" -- and demand an apology.

Jews are far smarter tacticians than Anglos, who somehow always wind up playing a lame game of defense. To score points, one must have a more well-rounded game.
Quibcag: The thoughtful girl with the book and glasses is Yuki Nagato (長門 有希 Nagato Yuki) from the anime, The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya (涼宮ハルヒの憂鬱 Suzumiya Haruhi no Yūutsu)