Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Rights and Monsters

This is a tad complicated, but this was too good not to post.  I'm reproducing exactly below a post from Nicholas Stix, which itself is a reposting of a comment on the American Renaissance blog. Now, I don't want to second-guess this guy, but I'm inclined to think he's a tad too black-and-white (heh!) and maybe some people who aren't White have a cultural concept of rights and responsibilities.  Not too many, but some, maybe in the Middle East and the Far East.  But maybe not.  I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.  But the thrust of his comment is basically concerning Europeans in contrast to Africans, and no realistic person can argue that he's wrong.


Are Blacks Monsters? Is Crime a White Idea?

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

I found the following disturbing essay today by an anonymous American Renaissance reader.
 ___________

Crime is a white idea. White people, and white people ONLY hold to certain rights and responsibilities all people have....so-called inalienable rights endowed to us by God. Violation of these rights makes one a criminal. Violating the rights of another is crime.

Where there is no recognition of those rights, there can be no crime. This is literally what almost every black person caught committing “crime” means when he exclaims, “I didn’ do nuffin.” He means he didn’t do anything wrong. His non-recognition of the basic rights of others, even to exist, means that the very idea that he might be doing something wrong, never enters into his head and he has no guilt whatsoever over the most heinous of acts... rape, robbery, murder, assault. The only limits he recognizes (and only during those rare times he bothers to think rationally at all) is the punishment and pain, even death, others will heap on him in retaliation. Such things, to his thinking are always unreasonable (I didn’ do nuffin’).

However, the flip side of such is a much desired outcome. How much he can get away with, and his victims are helpless to do anything about it, determines his status. The contradiction never enters his mind.

At best, non-whites are psychopaths, by our standards. But really, what they are, are monsters. What makes a monster a monster is his nature. Monsters don’t make decisions. Monsters lack choice. This is the fundamental misunderstanding all white people have with regard to non-whites.

People have choice. People change. People can be rehabilitated. People repent. Monsters cannot. Evil isn’t something they do. It’s something they are. As far as repentance goes, the term means to return. To go back to the beginning to a state of innocence and start again. Monsters can’t do that. They were never innocent. Think on THAT, the next time you see black children and wonder what they will be in 20 years. The liberal sees them, and feels hope. He feels hope because he sees children in a state of innocence. More experienced people notice that at age, 4, 5, 6, the black “children” are already hurting others. Where did they “learn” this? It is a mystery, until you admit they did not have to learn it. It’s not what they do. It’s what they are.

What is the point of all that? The point is that a crime rate that goes up and down, is largely meaningless. Who cares, if monsters are more or less active that season than in seasons prior? They are still monsters. No “progress” has been made, just because the “crime rate” is down. Quite frankly, such things have far more to do with changing demographics and the propensity for those in charge to simply lie, than anything else.

Which is a very important point. 
There is a certain threshold where the monsters take over and crime mysteriously disappears. Did the criminal behaviors stop? No... if anything they’ve dramatically increased. What is happening is a combination of monsters pretending to be cops, no longer arresting other monsters. Monsters in charge of keeping the stats, simply make up whatever lie is handy. And, worst of all, a monster faces a true jury of his peers when called to court and other monsters agree wholeheartedly with him that “he didn’ do nuffin.”

So-called crime is a white idea we virtually eliminated among ourselves. This issue with the monsters is completely different. Our techniques for dealing with crime are ludicrous in the face of what monsters are. What good is it to arrest a monster and jail him, when the entire population he belongs to is just like him? Will you arrest everyone? The U.S. seems to have tried. Some small success, at incredible costs. Can you rehabilitate a monster? Hahahaha... no. Punish a monster? Dat be rayciss... is the only response you will ever get.

All these things have in common the false paradigm of inclusion, [according to which] at the end of the day, what matters is they are of us, just like us, only different in skin color. That is not only untrue, it’s an intentional deception (by whom is a whole other question... one that leads to war). But with regard to “crime,” what we need is a paradigm of exclusion.

They are not human. They are monsters. No different than if we were in the middle of a bad zombie film. A whole different set of assumptions, behaviors, and beliefs apply.

Of course, “dat be rayciss.”

8 comments:

  1. I pointed out in a recent article that the way to recognize a real monster is that they see others as evil/things. Apparently Stix thinks the same thing, which only validates my idea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eager Young LiberalOctober 31, 2013 at 11:49 AM

      "You are the devil's donkey."

      Delete
  2. You need to (re)read Starship Troopers and pay note to RAH's comments re:collapse of Western society and specifically "juvenile delinquency." This describes the "society" Liberal Americans have imposed on Black America and are trying to impose on the rest of us. Mexicans (latinos in general) and Moslem immigrants are too clannish to fall for this (clannishness creates a class of "not me" people who have rights that must be respected), but our nation's misleaders are doing all they can to dissolve family bonds in all Americans especially white folk. Only their intrinsic failure to respect non white cultures have stopped them from working harder at wrecking non white and Moslem families. Maybe it's my respect for family loyalty that attracts me to mountain people and Scots.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Albert makes good sense. The family unit is the basis of Western civilization, period.

    Without strong families there is NO worthwhile society. There's been a steady attack and erosion of family in the US for 4 decades and it's escalating to the breaking point. Just look around and it's evident. The elite have set their sights on destroying every last vestige of the family and Western/Christian style civilization and they are well on that trajectory.

    Whites are a non-cohesive group and are ineffective at making group dynamic political change. We are effectively neutered from defending our own interests, other groups are not that way. The Marxist elite planned these strategies of tension over 60 years ago and have played us like a fiddle. They have used cultural Marxism to deny us our natural ability to stand for ourselves....how stupid we've become.

    God help the children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eager Young LiberalOctober 31, 2013 at 11:52 AM

      "A natural donkey, which carries sacks to the mill and eats thistles, can judge you - indeed, all creatures can! For a donkey knows it is a donkey and not a cow. A stone knows it is a stone; water is water, and so on through all the creatures. But you mad asses do not know you are asses."

      Delete
  4. The term Anti-White is hitting the mainstream and its changing the dialogue. Whites are finally learning they have to defend themselves if they are going to exist in the future. Anti-racism is just a code word for anti-white. "In your opinion I'm a racist. You're only saying that because I'm white." I've been watching the Bugsers for 6 years working to get that message out and its going viral now. The whole "racist" con game is folding and next up we need to smash their beloved terms Diversity and Hate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eager Young LiberalOctober 31, 2013 at 11:54 AM

      "It seems I must have liars and villains for opponents. I am not worthy in the sight of God that a godly and honorable person should discuss these matters with me in a Christian way. This is my greatest lament."

      Delete
  5. Eager Young LiberalOctober 31, 2013 at 11:51 AM

    "Before God and men I accuse all of you as arsonists, blasphemers, murderers, and ravagers of Christian piety."

    ReplyDelete