Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Third George Bush is a Charm

George III?
You can't make this stuff up, folks. The thing about the Bush bunch is that, despite W's pretty decent impersonation of a redneck accent-wise, they're a gang of New England liberals. If you're one of those who equate a belligerent foreign policy with conservatives, I refer you to history, with particular emphasis on Woodrow Wilson and FDR. So, W's inclination to stick his nose in other countries' business is just another aspect of his liberalism.  You may have noticed that this foreign policy element has been faithfully carried out by Obama, so the screwed-up interventionist madness that we've carried out since LBJ, with a slight cutback during the Reagan administration, has been liberal in orientation since forever.

But back to the Bushes.  A characteristic of liberals in general and New England liberals in particular is their strange ability to know what's good for you even when it doesn't seem that way to you at all.  They know that what goes on in places like Afghanistan and Syria and South Ossetia is terribly important to American interests, while stuff happening on our actual border is of minimal significance, even when it spills over the border.  They also know that the worst thing about America is Americans, which is why they're so eager to replace the American population with unchecked immigration, legal and illegal, from just about anywhere else.  In this respect, Republican neocons stand shoulder-to-shoulder with their liberal sisters in the Democratic Party.

And what better way to soften us all up to accept mass immigration than to blur the distinction between Americans and everybody else? Figuratively, you create an image a person who has some of the Old American characteristics, and some foreign characteristics, and this convinces us further that there's no real difference, kum-ba-ya, and this silly American "nationalism" is all a paranoid delusion, and we can and should be "citizens of the world." And then the globalist oligarchs can really take over.

But why do it just figuratively when you can also do it literally?  Enter George P. Bush.  If not right away, soon it will be time for another George Bush to run the country, and we have this third one here, ready to preside over the elimination of our Southern border and the amalgamation of the US and Mexico to create a Brave New World country, neither fish nor fowl, much more easily managed than a country dominated by a bunch of anarchistic rednecks with guns.

George P. is perfect for the job.  He was born here, and his father, Jeb, is an American citizen, so he's an American citizen.  And since his mother is a Mexican citizen (yes, I know she's a naturalized US citizen, but by Mexican law, she's still a Mexican citizen, too, and so are her children, wherever they're born), he's also a Mexican citizen, so there's no reason why he can't be President of both countries simultaneously.  Kind of like how Elizabeth is Queen of England and Scotland.

But in order to pull this off, we need a lot more Mexican immigration to the US, so they'll be here to vote for George III, and Steve Sailer points out how this could be a significant factor in the Bush family's enthusiasm for open borders.  Check out Steve's post HERE.

4 comments:

  1. He looks like the village idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What me worry...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wish never to hear the names Bush, Clinton or Kennedy again ever in my life.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry Anonymous, when the race to Romney finally ends in disaster. The race to Jeb Bush will begin. Palin/Bush in 2016, that’s the ticket.

    ReplyDelete