![]() |
| Cartoon by BALOO |
So, if what we need is another Lincoln, O'Reilly, I guess we need a nice big fratricidal Civil War, and we need to throw political dissenters in jail, defy habeas corpus, tax everybody to death, draft all the farm boys and let the upper classes buy their way out of the draft, and violate state laws by Federal proclamation. Go and read "The American Lenin," by L. Neil Smith, HERE. I'll wait. Okay? Well, Smith contrasts libertarians with conservatives in his essay, but I'd use slightly different terminology to come to the same conclusion. I'd use "paleoconservative" instead of "libertarian," and "neoconservative" instead of "conservative," because I think that, historically speaking, libertarianism is a basic part of paleoconservatism, and neoconservatism is the branch that rejects libertarian thinking, and that Lincolnism is the basis, the starting point, for the twin tyrannies of liberalism and neoconservatism in the United States today. The O'Reillys of this world, in contrast, like great big government and lots of regulation and try to scoop in the natural American paleoconservatives to support their "Big Government" conservatism, which is nothing other than New Deal liberalism, now known as neoconservatism, under the phony name of "conservatism." Further info on that HERE.
Well, listen and learn. With "conservatives" like O'Reilly, who needs "progressives" like Obama?

Bill O'Reilly is an idiot. The fact that he is an idiot about Lincoln as well doesn't surprise me.
ReplyDelete